MCAs commence process of impeaching Steve Simba as Deputy Speaker
Embu Ward MCAs have started impeachment proceedings
against Deputy Speaker Steve Simba to protest against his alleged “ineffective hands-off
leadership style.”
At least 30 out of 33 MCAs endorsed the tabling of a
Motion moved by Nominated MCA Edna Muisyo, stating that the entire August House
had lost confidence in the Runyenjes Central MCA. The Motion at the same time
demands that a fresh election to pick Simba’s successor be held within the next
10 days.
The MCAs are accusing Simba of belittling his
colleagues and being carried away by hefty allowances in endless during
retreats by the County Assembly’s Budget and Appropriations committee,
consequently failing to perform his duty as the conduit between MCAs and
Speaker Josiah Thiriku. Simba is also charged of abdicating his housekeeping duty
as chairman of the Liaison Committee.
In addition, the Runyenjes Central MCA was said to
have adopted dictatorial tendencies towards newly elected and nominated MCAs,
terming them as unqualified to question his authority. Simba also allegedlypushed
his way into the membership of seven Assembly committees, making him
unavailable to act as the chairman of the chairmen of all other committees and
hear their grievances and needs for facilitation.
While moving the Motion, Muisyo stated that Simba
had openly displayed arrogance and aloofness to his counterparts, therefore
thwarting efforts by MCAs to deliver on their mandate. She said he had been
blind to the welfare of MCAs and has blocked the facilitation of Assembly
committees to legislate.
However, despite the charged spirits exhibited by
MCAs to execute the ouster, the Speaker deferred the debate ordered that both
the accused and the accusing parties appear before the County Assembly Powers
and Privileges committee for a fair hearing before reporting back to the House
after one day. He said the laws of natural justice demanded that nobody be
‘crucified’ unheard.
Efforts by Simba to plead for three extra days to
marshal a defence team to study the laws establishing the Deputy Speaker’s
office proved futile after Thiriku ruled that the office in question was only
existent in the Assembly Standing Orders but was not constitutionally
recognised. He therefore said not all procedures of removing a constitutional
office holder would apply because the Deputy Speakership was not
constitutionally recognised.
The Assembly later adjourned, handing the embattled
Deputy Speaker a slim lifeline until a day later when his fate would be sealed
on account of the weight of grievances tabled before the Powers and Privileges
committee, his defence and the report on findings by the committee which is
responsible for enforcing MCA discipline.
Comments
Post a Comment